Leviton Motion Sensor Switch Pr180

Middle East: Egypt to open border

attitude of the UN on Gaza War
called all 15 members of the Security Council but in a non-binding "declaration" an immediate halt to the fighting. - It was late Saturday evening. The fighting continues.
justly criticized UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon "all governments of the world," too little to pay for peace in the Middle East.

superpower under the Christmas tree
It seems that the current power vacuum in Washington favored the escalation of violence. U.S. President George W. Bush is on vacation, may feel no longer responsible, Barack Obama would be silent, probably "call for cessation of hostilities" and the even is fortunate that this war began before he took office, because the spared him accusations, but his office is not the escalation easier.

What priority?
The time must not be wasted with moderation appeals and recriminations, but needs immediate, personal action: Because the parties do not comply with the required arm rest, should Egypt border to escape or evacuation to open the civilian population and build the international community detention center. And that should happen quickly, because the parties will not be intimidated by the threat to the civilian population to discourage warfare. The two sides have proven too often.
-markus sebastian Rabago- discussion

How To Do A Sorority Interest Letter

Middle East: Another war instead of negotiating with Hamas

As expected, the exact opposite happened to reason. None of the dialogue with Hamas to stop rocket attacks, no negotiations on the opening of borders for the civilian trade, but continuation of the blockade and the most violent in years airstrikes on the Gaza Strip, now with potentially more than 200 dead.
The EU expressed routinely referring to "serious concern and calls for restraint, a restraint, which it is entirely above suspicion, Tehran is suicide bombers routinely referred Paradise vouchers from, and the UN Secretary-General, may have to hear no one, for the most powerful countries in the world have long since all and nothing done to ensure that what happened happened and no peace as far as possible, because nothing makes the nations so docile as a little war and terrorism.
Hamas fired more extensive mini rockets, because the technical progress of the Craft Corner pyromaniac who did not. This is good but not enough to defeat Israel, but to make for individual murders and to Israel wuschig to swing a big hammer to invade if possible, so once again within range is what closes the borders and ordered them to faint. In the fight among the ruins themselves, the murder of those who let off steam, which believe they have nothing to lose. A murder, which can be easier than preach peace with the enemy, for peace with the enemy is treason. The fact that the gun only the ruins and corpses multiply, but that nothing at all for the better comes, will gradually become the certainty and the next "truce" to the stick again, not all - and to those who promise to not be used again, in order to make peace.
But first describe the different intentions. Hamas wants to wipe Israel and the Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak promised his countrymen and enemies, a "war to the bitter end."
Well, then be glad that the world's most powerful odds are in your views and allowed to continue the killing. >> Discussion

How To Tell A Scorpio Man My Feelings

bad intentions New Year

continued on the grounds of Israeli military operations, the Iranian-and Syrian-backed Hamas denounced the truce, but ignored that subject to the Israeli attacks of the terrorist rocket attackers in the Gaza Strip, ie that the truce was permanently crippled by anti-Israeli forces .
staged with cinematic martial parades black-masked Hamas gunman their "combat readiness", doubts motivated by hostility anyway, no one but the fact that Hamas is going against the missile attackers and make it to court. That can only conclude that either Hamas itself behind the rocket attacks infected or all the propaganda, despite the situation in the Gaza Strip did not have control.
If Hamas does not learn that they will work with Israel against terrorism has to be anything from working in the commercial interest of the Palestinians. Conversely, Israel despite hostility, acts of terrorism and termination of the ceasefire to work towards military cooperation and adherence to the ceasefire there. discussion

Gay Gloryhole Sacramento

Criticism of Israeli "settlement activity"

term "settlements" is unacceptable euphemism
by Editor on Sat 23 Aug 2008, 13:31

If by "Israeli settlements" is mentioned, say something like that only settlements be meant, which are located within its own borders, while it needs for housing outside their own territory the permission of the government there. This is not the the "Israeli settlements" in Palestinian territory.

The "Israeli settlements" in international law as "government crime" and "land grab" to be classified, for the land acquisition is done under threat or use of illegal, military force.
On this course, Israel may not be supported. Why protest and the freezing of military cooperation would be logical.

by the freezing of military cooperation should be different but that the Federal Republic Germany Israel for the territory within the limits of the 1967 military assistance grants, for in consequence of the Israeli government's crimes should not be put at risk the destruction of Israel.

Military assistance should not supplying arms to "self defense" made while the Israeli government would ensure no misuse of funds and the limits of "self defense" ignores and passes.
Military assistance would have to mean that the Federal Republic of any attack on Israel responds in its legitimate boundaries of international law and diplomatic missions with defensive measures, 1 if Israel is calls and 2 its existence is seriously threatened, and 3 ... see below.

BUT: The support of this policy proposal is so far incompatible with the constitution because the constitution prohibits a number of good reasons, military alliances and military operations abroad if they why not within a system of "collective defense system" as 3rd

Prerequisite: The Basic Law should be changed. Mere government decisions have already been through decisions of the Constitutional Court prohibited, but the parliamentary approval is not enough in my opinion the basic statutory prohibition. The 3rd Condition must be that of the German Federal assistance mandated by the United Nations issued.

side issue: the Israeli government refused by the elected Palestinian Hamas recognition as a negotiating counterpart in the necessary dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians. Substance was non-recognition of the fact that Hamas refused to recognize the Israeli state.
Already this mutual non-recognition is an outrage and a major obstacle to the peace process.
basic course>> www.inidia.de / friedensverhandlungen.htm

The euphemistically called "settlements" is the most blatant non-recognition policy by the Israeli government that is credible by this policy, their recognition claim As against the enemies of Israel.

-Mark Rabago->> discussion

Greens against Israeli settlement policy
of documents on Sat 23 Aug 2008, 12:45 PM

Nr.115/08 of 25.07.2008
federal government should position against Israeli settlement plans
belong to Israeli plans to build a new settlement in the West Bank said Reinhard Bütikofer National Chairman of Alliance 90/The Greens:

"With the plans in Maskiot a new settlement in the occupied West Bank the Israeli government fails to establish the same against a number of international agreements. It creates in a provocative manner, an additional obstacle to the necessary Israeli-Palestinian dialogue.

The settlement plans are against the agreement in Annapolis. You fail at the same time against Israeli commitments to the European Union, not the former settlers from the Gaza Strip to settle in the West Bank.

I therefore urge the Chancellor and the Foreign Minister to protest against the Israeli government against these plans and to demand compliance with previously-made commitments "

Rice to the Israeli settlement policy: ." Not helpful "

>> discussion

Airsoft Tournaments 2010 Pa

speech Steinmeier calls for "60 Years of Israel"

Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier in the debate in the German Bundestag, "60 Years of Israel"
Mr. President, I greatly respected ladies and gentlemen,

did 60 years ago, the citizens of the newly founded state of Israel its first passports in hand. These passports had a special feature. They carried the note: This passport is valid in all countries except Germany. - That was 60 years ago. Two and a half months we were nine members of the federal cabinet with our Israeli counterparts at the joint memorial at Yad Vashem. I have known: That was one of the most moving Moments in my political life.

lie between this restriction notice that I have spoken, and the German-Israeli government consultations, two and a half months 60 years and 60 years of work by representatives of Israeli and German politics, but also 60 years of work by citizens. Academics and trade unionists were the ones who have established the first contacts in civil society level between Germany and Israel.

Today, 43 years after the establishment of diplomatic relations, our relations with Israel as varied and rich in content as with almost any other country in the world. Israel, Germany is now one of his closest allies and friends, a development that we must certainly meet with gratitude.

However - many have pointed out - we have to accept most, if Amos Oz writes:

No normalization. Normal relations between Germany and Israel are not possible and appropriate. have brought

The Shoah, the murder of millions, the immense suffering, the German on German and other Europeans of Jewish faith, is part of our history. The daily reminder and the daily confrontation with the Holocaust, racism, and even with anti-Semitism with us is therefore part of our present and will and must remain part of our future. Therefore be up our relations with Israel forever be a special relationship.

What does this mean but today, 60 years after the founding of Israel? For me, this leads to three key tasks for German foreign policy: The first task - have all said - is the commitment to the existence and the security of the State of Israel. That must be a constant of German foreign policy. This in fact is also the talk of the Iranian President to counter again. His denial of the Holocaust is as unbearable as the questioning Israel's existence. For this purpose, there must be clear messages.

Ladies and gentlemen, to support for Israel is in my opinion, but something else. I quote again Amos Oz:

What Israel needs most of all, is an emotional
is insurance. Because we feel like outlaws cursed and hated
. Such support would cost a penny, only
empathy. This one does not agree with Israeli policy
. But a European sympathy for the plight of Israel today
the moderates and doves could help.

thought in these words of Amos Oz, I personally sometimes something inexpensive way in which we from our European wing chair with clever commentary on the Middle East peace process and garnish judge our frustration at lack of progress with smart advice for Israel.

You do not in fact agree with any suggestion of Israeli policy, and where there is dissent, speak openly about it. But my experience also indicate that a critical word is the easier, or perhaps accepted only if it is from a friend who is really understanding and empathy for the predicament - many have rightly spoken of a threat - the other has and shows.

The second contract for German foreign policy, I see that our bilateral relations even closer design and develop future-oriented. In the Government consultation two and a half months we have opened a new chapter. New fields of cooperation have been agreed and will be processed. Above all, the German-Israeli Future Forum will get underway this year. It is a young generation offer prospects for cooperation in economy, culture and science.

The third important issue, which arises from the special nature of relations between Germany and Israel, is our commitment to peace in the Middle East. The responsibility for the past - I have this morning also been heard in many speeches - is in fact a driving force for this commitment Germany in the Middle East and must remain so.

We know that implementation of the two-state solution, all partners will require difficult compromises. We also know - at least we should know - that we required for this determination and vision of Europe can not replace.

But we can help with work on the environment. This we have through reviving the Middle East Quartet, by advertising that the Arab states are included, and this done, that we have in the past year brought an EU Action Strategy for the Middle East on the way to improve I mentioned conditions.

This classic diplomacy one of them, but in my view, the situation in the Middle East, all in just yet everything. Who is speaking in Ramallah, Jericho, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, the people will find two things: both the desire for peace and the disillusionment with the failed attempts at a solution in decades, are now everywhere.

This means, in my view that we need to feel even more strongly held to work on concrete measures and to feel the people in the region that the path to peace is worthwhile. We do this through many measures that I will not list them all.

These include the large international Conference on Security in Palestine, on 24 June will be held here in Berlin. At this conference we want to create the conditions so that the international community to provide its contribution, that Palestine can accept responsibility for its own security.

Why do I say that? I say this because we are guided in all of this with the knowledge that more security in Palestine ultimately means more security for Israel.

Mr. Minister, I am pleased that the Israeli government is such that the reaction of the Israeli side to the convening of this conference was positive.

On Saturday I will become one of my eighth trip to the Middle East to leave, to Beirut, Jerusalem and Ramallah. The - I want to say - Middle Eastern sky has brightened slightly. I am pleased that the crisis in Lebanon by the Arab League mediation failed to resolve.

The election of new Lebanese president may now create the conditions that preceded the rebuilding of functioning state institutions in Lebanon. I am also pleased that held indirect talks between Israel and Syria.

The Turkish foreign minister to us, when he will be in Berlin tomorrow, learn about the progress of these talks. This follows the conviction that it is comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East be more difficult without the involvement of partners, particularly without the involvement of Syria, probably not. I understand the signals from the region are such that one has to operate with both sides trust.

We want Israel and its people for the 60th Anniversary of the founding of one thing: peace, a peace that the people deserve, a peace that requires our review. From the responsibility for the past obligation arises for the future.

Goldwell Vs Redken Shampoo

Sergei Lavrov Middle East conference in Moscow

Moscow's Middle East conference must not be postponed

LONDON, 02 May (RIA Novosti). Moscow's Middle East conference must not be delayed for a long time.
The Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in his opinion on the results of the meetings on the Middle East to the press in London.
He added that Russia was ready to implement the conference. But the consent of all major participants was necessary.

"Our Israeli partners doubt that this must be done quickly, and expressed the opinion that one must consider and determine the optimal deadlines," said Lavrov.
He indicated that the issue of the Moscow conference at the meetings on the Middle East in London had been discussed. According to him, all show Arab countries and the Palestinian side great interest for this conference.

"The European Union advocates that they convene as soon as possible. The Secretary-General and the U.S. has a positive attitude to this idea, "said the Russian foreign minister.
on the restoration of Palestinian unity in depth, Lavrov stressed that all aspects of the situation does not in and around the Gaza Strip could be solved without solving this problem.
"The efforts of our Egyptian colleagues, Yemen and the Russian Federation on coordination of the conditions addressed to restore unity in which these could, "he said.
The Minister pointed out that Russia is looking into contacts with Hamas, the head of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and Arab countries for ways to solve this issue. According to Lavrov's words

Moscow is convinced that any agreements between Israel and Palestine without a solution to this problem will not be sufficiently effective.

Claddagh For Best Friends

chronology of the Middle East conflict

From 1882 to 1903 First wave of immigration (aliyah) of 30,000 mostly Russian Jews to Palestine. Many of them walk a short time later due to the harsh living conditions again.
1896 proposes Theodor Herzl in his book "The Jewish State "to establish a Jewish state before.
1897 the first Zionist Congress in Basel will bring the creation of a "homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine" to the program.
1905-1914 second wave of immigration of about 40,000 Jews mostly from Eastern Europe.

1909 groundbreaking ceremony of Tel Aviv on 11 April, First kibbutz 'Degania. promote

1915 epistolary declaration of the British High Commissioner McMahon to King Hussein, an Arab independence and the establishment of an Arab state in order to win the support of Arabs in the First World War.

1917 in the Balfour Declaration is on 2 November the Jews from the British a "national home" in Palestine promised.

1917-1918 The army of the Ottoman Empire is defeated by Great Britain, Palestine was occupied by the British.

7th November 1918 Anglo-French declaration to the peoples of Palestine, Syria and Iraq, a total exemption and "freely elected national governments" guarantee.

gets England in 1920 by the League of Nations mandate over the territories of present-day Jordan, Israel and Palestine, which were previously well as the surrounding countries have been part of the Ottoman Empire.

is 1923, the Mandate of divided, the land is east of the Jordan River to the Emirate of Transjordan.

in 1929 at the height of unrest between the Arab and Jewish population in Palestine, the Jewish community in Hebron victims of a massacre. 67 Jews died, including women and children. The survivors were evacuated.

makes 1937 a British Commission a proposal to divide Palestine into a smaller Jewish and a larger Arab part. The Jews are not accepted by the Arabs.

22nd July 1946 attack by the late Prime Minister Menachem Begin led the Irgun terrorist organization on the Jerusalem King David Hotel, headquarters of the British General Staff, in which 91 people were killed.

1947 on 29 November the UN General Assembly decides by 33 votes to 13 with 10 abstentions (Res. 181) that the 609 000 Jews of Palestine, 30.6% of the population, receive 55% of the soil, while the 1.38 million Palestinian Arabs, 69.4% of the population, 42% of the country will be awarded (see UN partition plan for Palestine). The Arab states, the Arab League and the Palestinian "Arab High Committee," are opposed to the division from then.

1948 five Arab countries attack Israel immediately after the founding of the state of (Israeli War of Independence), but from Israel repulsed. 750,000 Arab Palestinians become refugees by the war. (See the Palestinian refugee problem), its property and land confiscated by Israel. Same time, 750,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries and flee destitute to Israel where they were integrated as citizens. This mutual expulsion of non-combatants lay the foundation for the conflict to civil war level.

1956 Suez crisis. Conflict of France, England and Israel with Egypt

Yasser Arafat founded in 1959 along with three other Palestinian students Fatah (Harakat al-Tahrir at-Filastin - Movement for the Liberation of Palestine) which is the "armed struggle to liberate Palestine" to the program makes. It intervenes in the following years of Gaza and West Bank from Jordanian civilian targets in Israel.

1964 at the initiative of the Arab League, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded in the Jordanian East Jerusalem with the two fundamental goals of Arab unity and the liberation of Palestine. Zionism is seen as a colonialist movement. First Chairman of the Palestinian diplomat Ahmed Schukairi.

1967 Six-Day War: Egypt closes the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping, troops move on Israel's border and warned the UN troops in front of a forthcoming soon Attack. Israel responds with a preemptive strike, pushed back the Arab forces occupied and administered by Jordan, the West Bank, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula and Gaza Strip administered by Egypt. In the following years, Israel begins to colonize the territories systematically. The UN Security Council Resolution 242 of the UN Security Council declared the acquisition of territory by war is inadmissible and calls for Israel to withdraw from occupied on (not all or) areas. They also called for the political independence of every State in the region and the right, within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats to life or violence. The complete defeat in the Six-Day War and Expulsions and perceived humiliation (such as the Suez crisis) promote Islamism by the Muslims concentrate more strongly on their religion and radicalize.

1969 Fatah and PLO unite during the 5th Palestinian National Congress

1970 After a rebellion against the Government of Jordan (Black September), the PLO expelled from Jordan and is in Lebanon.

1973 Yom Kippur War: Egypt and Syria to achieve first initial military successes, but are then forced back by Israel. Parts of the Sinai are recaptured, and Sadat stopped the attack only after intervention of the U.S., while Israeli troops to Damascus stand. Through the oil export stop it comes to the oil crisis. Sadat succeeds the containment of Islamism by the demonstration of Arab strength.

was in 1977 after the Yom Kippur War Israel's weakness became clear proposes Anwar as-Sadat in a position of relative strength out of a meeting with Menachem Begin in front, from 19 - 21 November takes place and prepare the peace agreement at Camp David 1978th

1978 Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat sign the Camp David peace agreement, negotiated by Jimmy Carter. The Palestinian side is committed to nonviolence, while the Israeli side of one end of the municipal building and the withdrawal from the occupied territories appeals.

1980 By law, Israel annexed in July, the conquered East Jerusalem in the Six Day War and declared Jerusalem the "eternal" and "undivided" capital, which meets in particular in the Arab world in protest.

1981 Anwar Sadat is assassinated in Cairo by Islamists because of the peace agreement at Camp David.

1982 Israel withdraws from the Sinai Peninsula.

1982 Operation Peace for Galilee (Lebanon Campaign): Israel's invasion into Lebanon, siege and capture of Beirut. Expulsion of the PLO to Tunisia. Massacres by Lebanese Christian Phalange militia against the civilian population (Sabra and Shatila).

1987 First activities of Hamas, the outbreak of the first intifada, violent riots in the Israeli occupied zone.

1993 beginning of the Oslo Peace Process: Negotiations between Israel and the PLO. The PLO says violence. Israel assures the establishment of an autonomous Palestinian state. Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat received for this historic step, the Nobel Peace Prize.

1994 The extremist settler Baruch Goldstein in Hebron killed with an assault rifle 29 Muslims praying at the grave of the patriarch, more than 100 injured. Then break out all over the riots, for which 19 Palestinians and five Israelis died.

1995 Yitzhak Rabin on 4 November by the Israeli right-wing extremist Yigal Amir assassinated in Tel Aviv.

1996 After several suicide bombings earlier this year won the critics of the Oslo peace process, Benjamin Netanyahu, Shimon Peres just before the elections and becomes the new prime minister. It quickly becomes clear that it will come under its authority to make any further major steps in the peace process. Following consequent refusal of Israel to evacuate the settlements without inputs, it comes to violent uprisings of Palestinians and attacks on the Palestinian civilian population.

2000 The talks between Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat at Camp David II failed. It comes to the 2 Intifada - the reasons are presented by Israel and the Palestinians is very different.

2001 The conservative politician and former general Ariel Sharon is elected prime minister. The conflict intensified (the Palestinian suicide bombings, killing of leading members of Palestinian resistance groups by the Israelis).

2003 U.S. President George W. Bush presented the roadmap to peace which implies that the Palestinians renounced attacks against Israel and Israel recognizes Palestine as an autonomous state. Israeli troops march again in the short term in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The Israeli government begins construction of an approximately 720 km long barrier around the West Bank.

2003 elections to the 16th Knesset. The Likud of Ariel Sharon wins the elections, Prime Minister of 28 January. In March, the coalition government under Sharon is sworn. The coalition consists of the following parties: Likud, Shinui, National Religious and National Unity.

2004 The Israeli government begins with the policy of targeted killing of enemies of the State of Israel. The most prominent victim is the spiritual leader and founder of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmed Yasin, the 22 March is killed by a helicopter attack. On 17 April, the Hamas leader Abd al-Aziz al-Rantisi killed in the Jasin had called after the assassination, the Arab world to war against Israel. Hamas vows revenge immediately. On 20 September, the Israeli Air Force kill Khaled Abu Selmiya, the commander of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades. During the year it will also give several high profile activities of the Israeli Army (Operation Rainbow in May, the Day of Atonement in early October). Yasser Arafat died on 11 November in a Paris military hospital.

2005 began in August, the month-long evacuation of all 21 illegally built Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and four more in the West Bank by the Israeli army. This led to violent conflict between settlers and Military personnel. About 8,000 people were transferred by this action. Sharon resigns from Likud and founded a new party, Kadima.

2006 The resistance group Hamas wins the elections in the Palestinian territories.
the 28th of the Israeli parliamentary elections March 2006 was founded in 2005 by Ariel Sharon, liberal, politically chosen between Likud and Labor formed Kadima with 28 of the 120 seats the largest party and Ehud Olmert the new prime minister. He stated that they want to continue Sharon's policy and work towards a final demarcation between Israel and the Palestinian territories to do (convergence) plan.
After prolonged Border conflicts between Hamas and Hezbollah with Israel it comes to the war in Lebanon 2006th The Israeli air force is flying attacks on targets of Hezbollah in Lebanon and penetrates with ground troops in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese army is neutral. The conflict ended with a ceasefire and the deployment of the UN protection force UNIFIL.

In June 2007 comes to civil war fighting between militias of the Hamas and Fatah, during which Hamas in complete control of the Gaza Strip reached, while the Fatah gained control of the West Bank. The conflict is also the end of the government of national unity.

2007 on 27 November 2007 will take place in Annapolis an initiated by the U.S. Government International Middle East conference to be hoped the decisive prerequisites for peace in the Middle East.

Polaris Scrambler Rebuild

Israel's UN diplomat: "Carter has blood on their hands"

Israel's UN Ambassador Dan Gillerman was obviously an outburst, when should apply what the "Welt.de reported on his criticism of Carter's talks with Hamas:
Carter had made a good president, but now become a fan, criticized the diplomat. The Nobel Peace Prize winner had already traveled with dirty hands in the Middle East. Come back he was but "with bloody hands after he Khaled Mashaal, the leader of Hamas, the hand has given. " While Carter had been with Mashaal in Damascus, Hamas had "attacked our cities and maim Israeli babies.

It may be argued that the makes dialogue with the enemy sense, but it should not be that someone in this dialogue, will be declared the enemy.

The Israeli government should suspend Dan Gillerman, because who does not want to share with enemies at the table is fit only for fair-weather politics, but not to diplomacy in conflict situations.

-Mark Rabago-

Wording For Guest To Pay For Drinks

comment on Clinton's Israel Solidarity

U.S. presidential election campaigner Hillary Clinton was asked what she intended to do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons. As did the former First Lady again and did not come under suspicion of "feminine weakness", tried and did not even mind that such a scenario is a typical hard-line chimera, and promptly threatened with "extinction of Iran." Whether
shook Tehran mullahs? No, because their power is based on an anti-Americanism, for it is precisely such threats need - really nice apocalyptic, step into the "paradise".
Clinton should have answered. "We want to prevent Iran And if that fails, then we will do everything to bring peace to the crusher to take responsibility. "

And as you can see the thing in Moscow? where one is gloating about any escalation of conflicts in which the U.S. is involved, as can then benefit from it, with weapons to Syria and Iran, with Russian gas, as long as Iran does not, for reasons of its political isolation in the European business can participate. (msr)

Sinus Mucus Coming Out In Eye

Jimmy Carter spoke with Hamas leadership

The Nobel Peace Prize and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter traveled despite the Gemäkels many political colleagues in the Middle East, and conferred with Hamas, whose willingness to explore how it could be an Israeli-Palestinian peace treaty.

As a result, Carter said the talks that the Hamas leadership negotiated a peace treaty between Israel and Abbas will not oppose, if it refers to an Israel within its 1967 borders and the treaty will go in favor of a Palestinian referendum. This conversation

result can be a milestone on the road to peace, if only he would seriously wanted.
Who now still refuses diplomatic relations and negotiations with Hamas because it refuses to recognize the State of Israel, just will not go the necessary steps, but dictate the fate of the military, the loss of face for Hamas, and ultimately to the Palestinians, too bad they may be always represented by Hamas.

-Mark Rabago-

Why Do Acohoolics Get Skinny

PARADE

Once in this house a long time nothing was going on, takes on global psychosocial group holzklau.de order, with its own blog - without Google's control, and so ...
So Psycho global reach from now on:

http://www.gruppe-holzklau.de/psychoglobal

Where Do They Put Ivs For Wisdom Teeth Removal?

legal positivism and the Middle East conflict

still deny many organizations, especially Iran and the anti-Israeli terrorism, the UN decided that the state of Israel and allowed Israel to be admitted.

The world's majority of international law position is then as now, in my opinion true: that is if not more military justice themselves decide the fate of nations, then it should be decided by the United Nations.
that international decisions are not just and loving are all concerned, but also bring masses of disadvantages such as benefits, rarely achieve the ideal compromise for a reason in the rush to respond to the expectations and conflicts in order to prevent further vigilantism.
This is not always possible. This is also not in conflict about the state of Israel, but as a law does not lose its validity claim that someone violates the other hand, a decision by the United Nations as long as international law, as he is not abandoned - and a military vigilante contrast to international law.

The wars and the terrorism against Israel, when someone would see disadvantaged by a law or a ruling, and would therefore in arms against the perceived or actual beneficiaries . Rebel

The legal positivism is the fundamental decision for the political, legal, therefore civil dispute, including civil toleration of disadvantages in the knowledge that the disadvantages would outweigh military vigilantism.

can for this very positivist view indeed be argued that it is the world's majority, but as soon as a party to the conflict does suffer directly, it tends to be evasive legal concepts such as "natural law" or religious, in short, intrinsically moral legitimation, which may indeed have height, but no beyond mere intuition and their advocacy beyond general applicability, could justify their step in the military justice themselves, as is the Middle East conflict for decades reality.

The legal positivism is no guarantee of inerrancy or justice, which is why every law on the one hand to redeem or reform remains to critically, on the other hand, should be an incentive to do justice to it in the best possible way if there is interest in their preservation.
why should Israel be especially Israel and the critical decisions of the United Nations, particularly as Israel can divert their state certification to claim only the decisions of the United Nations, not about the "Land of the Fathers" and similar idioms have all the appropriate emotional, not legal weight.

is highly visible at all, choice of legal positivism, that he is driven to abuse, because it is instrumentalized for conformity and subservience. Therefore, the civil resistance be granted legal protection, ie non-violent resistance is not punishable as a resistance against the state, but individual and collective human rights.

Unless so humiliated Palestinians by the Israeli state and violated rights view, they should go the way of civil resistance. But for the sake of mere denial it would be counter-productive, but should his emphasis on negotiations with the goal of peaceful compromise for mutual benefit as an alternative to continued mutual hostility, violence and destruction.

would Finally, failure of legal positivism because the legislation is undemocratic, but they wanted to act only for the benefit of democracy if it were flawless and perfect, would advance no democracy or either the right or Social wait in perfection , but can work only. Why must the right of the United Nations are considered international law because international law can not be fairer in the weapons programs are competing nations.

-msr->> Diskussionen.de

Football Center Jockstrap

to suicide bombing in / against Israel

first time since January 2007, it was a Selbtmordattentat. This time in the southern town of Dimona Israle. A woman was killed, many injured, another bomber died on camera. A medic had wanted to help the man taken by shrapnel, but then discovered the explosive belt and finished out of fear of the explosion assistance. A police officer fired several times at the victim from close range, to prevent him from the explosive ignition.

media reports showed jubilant Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, and the father of one of these bombers expressed his "pride" of the crime his son. No tears for the lost son, nothing, so dehumanized deep is the hostility, made from such attacks.

"Confessor" there are plenty: Hamas, then the PFLP = militant Fatah wing of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine "and the" Army of Palestine "to the" Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades "and how they all hot, do not understand that "martyrs" only can be who is to die for something ready, while the self-sacrifice was for the purpose of killing anything to do with "martyrs," but in "suicide commandos" his historically not always good witness .

Wer assassination against civilians, but by the murderers as "martyrs" speaks, it is unquestionably a liar.

has as little to do with "liberation", which is a result of the war to "ruin" in the way and brings the Palästinser among the ruins in the dependence on humanitarian aid deliveries, because in exchange of rocket fire from Israel are now times not combine, but tanks.

It is believed that the bombers to and from Egypt came about largely unsecured border desert, were arrested in the past week alone in the 16 armed Palestinians from Egyptian border guards. The Israeli government said so, this long border is also quickly to secure by barriers. It is hoped that Israel, at least this segment of the border (= sand, sand, sand) abzwackt not foreign territory, but built within their own country. In contrast, calls out "Handelsblatt", Israeli Vice Prime Minister Eli Yishai of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, a reconquest of the border between Gaza and Egypt, which Israel had evacuated 2005 - and simultaneously: "We have to stop any kind of diplomatic negotiations immediately . Instead of negotiations, we must now deal with security. "
As if one excludes the other - as if the construction workers were delegates at the negotiating table otherwise.
So
gratifying that a spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said that the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority Abbas to continue despite the attack. - Whether such negotiations are sufficient to the exclusion of Hamas, I doubt it, but if the negotiations are carried out effectively, it could arise Fatah towards Hamas benefits that need it desperately.

It is hoped that by bringing the stop in part of Israeli society and politics provoked revenge no U-turn regarding the Verhandlungswilligkeit. To fear it is because Israeli intelligence agencies announced that more than 50 warnings before further planned Attacks are present.

-Mark Rabago->> discussion

How Do You Make Fish Not Stick To The Pan

Inidia Discussion: recognition of Israel

P. wrote on 05/02/2008 08:59 clock: "recognition of the right of each state to exist is in my opinion, the basic preconditions for peace negotiations What should be negotiated. if both would be mutually deny this? "

@ Po, there is little public the reinsurance there, come on, how the donor money is used and why, for example, the EU can avoid self-organized distribution, but to suggest is that a) otherwise still difficult, would be the political structures to influence positively, b) it would undermine democratic moments when would not cooperate with the elected structures.

But let the alternative scenario, you'd be for the distribution of aid meant for the civilian population and absolute responsibility to ensure that terrorists are not the beneficiaries, ... - Already hard to imagine enough, but even then it would by no means ensures that the terrorism is the basis would be withdrawn, because a) he is nourished not from noodles and medicines, but from politically unresolved problems, b) it would be grad mal "international division of labor", if the EU is purchasing the drugs, while Iran Russia backs the Kalashnikovs worried. So it is important that EU, U.S. and other global powers to civilize her Konkurrenzspielchen other negotiating tables.

Again for the recognition problem: is for you as well as fix to me that the existence of Israel's legal claim is legitimized by UN resolutions?

for the destruction of Israel itself is therefore irrelevant whether the individual states, organizations, individuals will be denied, for they too are bound by the decisions of the United Nations could then possibly there to press for revision.
they desire no revision, but tried it with war and terrorism today, so this regard it is simply "Outlaws".

But because of the criminals we do not throw the criminal law on board, but have it just for the purpose of combating crime. The criminal law only insofar as we debated when we have the impression that it was too full of holes, or we look to prevention and enforcement of appropriate resources.
other but in international affairs, for which there is but the first signs of Rechtsförmigkeit, such as the International Criminal Court, but far too little and still less codifying prevention and enforcement agents.

The required development process is blocked by U.S. and Israel only because because they rely solely on its military power, although it appears that that the opposing force at best, relocated to terrorism, after the political violence has achieved maximum = war in his / her potential for destruction.

accepted time, my wish scenario would take place, then came back the people and the front men of the Middle East conflict before the investigators and then to court.
order to compare it with horizons of experience, could it be that find themselves two rival mafia gangs because of crimes perpetrated against each other in the same process, two organizations within the meaning without any right to claim recognition - by law or a mafia gang, together with a "Recognized" Ltd, which supplied the unlawful slaughter - or both "recognized" public companies that compete in its competition law - or only one of the sides would have behaved illegally, ...
But all their mutual appreciation (recognition) would be perfect for any reasonable court irrelevant. The dispute would be settled, would be convicted of illegal activity, lack of acknowledgment would be replaced by court order, etc.

They are for me as a completely ordinary civilian matters, including dissatisfaction, if my right is disregarded, but it is even better, the bad pill to swallow as each pack grenades under the chairs.

But such Rechtsförmigkeit in international relations is under-developed and the parties of the Middle East conflict keep almost equally to non-partisan decision, since to them the non-partisan credibility and seems often enough is disingenuous, the immediate parties to the dispute an even greater obligation, the dispute arises bilaterally enclosed. involve
Since many states in the background their own interests, so a lot of negotiating tables necessary.
And that may / may be opened to mutual respect and recognition = missing value estimation accuracy be a prior condition, especially the lack of recognition is the fundamental reason of their conflict.

And again: Peace is made with the enemy as possible by negotiation on all disputed issues, including the lack of recognition, while you ask the actors in the Middle East only to the negotiating table when they have solved the main problem.

That's the difference between your and my political thinking. You is the result of a "precondition", while I was negotiating motive at best.

-msr->> discussion