term "settlements" is unacceptable euphemism
by Editor on Sat 23 Aug 2008, 13:31
If by "Israeli settlements" is mentioned, say something like that only settlements be meant, which are located within its own borders, while it needs for housing outside their own territory the permission of the government there. This is not the the "Israeli settlements" in Palestinian territory.
The "Israeli settlements" in international law as "government crime" and "land grab" to be classified, for the land acquisition is done under threat or use of illegal, military force.
On this course, Israel may not be supported. Why protest and the freezing of military cooperation would be logical.
by the freezing of military cooperation should be different but that the Federal Republic Germany Israel for the territory within the limits of the 1967 military assistance grants, for in consequence of the Israeli government's crimes should not be put at risk the destruction of Israel.
Military assistance should not supplying arms to "self defense" made while the Israeli government would ensure no misuse of funds and the limits of "self defense" ignores and passes.
Military assistance would have to mean that the Federal Republic of any attack on Israel responds in its legitimate boundaries of international law and diplomatic missions with defensive measures, 1 if Israel is calls and 2 its existence is seriously threatened, and 3 ... see below.
BUT: The support of this policy proposal is so far incompatible with the constitution because the constitution prohibits a number of good reasons, military alliances and military operations abroad if they why not within a system of "collective defense system" as 3rd
Prerequisite: The Basic Law should be changed. Mere government decisions have already been through decisions of the Constitutional Court prohibited, but the parliamentary approval is not enough in my opinion the basic statutory prohibition. The 3rd Condition must be that of the German Federal assistance mandated by the United Nations issued.
side issue: the Israeli government refused by the elected Palestinian Hamas recognition as a negotiating counterpart in the necessary dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians. Substance was non-recognition of the fact that Hamas refused to recognize the Israeli state.
Already this mutual non-recognition is an outrage and a major obstacle to the peace process.
basic course>> www.inidia.de / friedensverhandlungen.htm
The euphemistically called "settlements" is the most blatant non-recognition policy by the Israeli government that is credible by this policy, their recognition claim As against the enemies of Israel.
-Mark Rabago->> discussion
Greens against Israeli settlement policy
of documents on Sat 23 Aug 2008, 12:45 PM
Nr.115/08 of 25.07.2008
federal government should position against Israeli settlement plans
belong to Israeli plans to build a new settlement in the West Bank said Reinhard Bütikofer National Chairman of Alliance 90/The Greens:
"With the plans in Maskiot a new settlement in the occupied West Bank the Israeli government fails to establish the same against a number of international agreements. It creates in a provocative manner, an additional obstacle to the necessary Israeli-Palestinian dialogue.
The settlement plans are against the agreement in Annapolis. You fail at the same time against Israeli commitments to the European Union, not the former settlers from the Gaza Strip to settle in the West Bank.
I therefore urge the Chancellor and the Foreign Minister to protest against the Israeli government against these plans and to demand compliance with previously-made commitments "
Rice to the Israeli settlement policy: ." Not helpful "
>> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment