How It Made A Sand Buggy

Netanyahu gave his speech, but hardly a promise

The Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is known in principle to a two-state solution and demands that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state and the demilitarized be needed for the above reasons that I think is right, but who insist on a demilitarized neighbors without having to demilitarize itself, would certainly renounce annexations that Netanyahu intends to continue with the "settlements" on Palestinian territories .
The question of honesty it does not seem to employ. On the contrary, Netanyahu breaks the binding commitments of previous governments. In this way, the Israeli policy entangled deeper and deeper, even internally, because every "settlers" will make a speech about his actions and for political or military support. will

Also at the annexation of East Jerusalem Netanyahu hold: "Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel." The UN resolutions and Obama see things differently.

What some commentators celebrate as a concession Netanyahu because he was known for two states, may represent a step forward in his person, but its territorial claims are contrary to the peace process.

The international community must now think carefully about the votes and actions it takes to Israel allocate progressively in the 1967 borders or to find other ways of compensation and enforce.

Netanyahu can miss it on their own compensation ideas. Perhaps the Palestinians have any ideas? Netanyahu offered the Palestinian Authority immediate peace negotiations: "They should be included without any precondition."

The unconditional for negotiations is always right. Whether this is really understood? Because many do not understand the difference, that peace is indeed subject to conditions, the negotiations but there must be free of preconditions, which go beyond the table of the negotiators.
>> www.inidia.de / friedensverhandlungen.htm

Netanyahu repeatedly stressed Israel's right to self defense, as it would equally challenged by his critics as it is contested by the enemies of Israel. The self-defense but it is not self-defense more when it comes to securing stolen land. The
must it be said clearly, although he already knows, because he can not be so stupid. But he is also not allowed to believe that he has outside his electorate international backing for a defense as trimmings annexations.

Mark Rabago>> discussion