claims to the Middle East conflict parties Ahead of Netanyahu's speech - Mark Rabago
This weekend Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu will present his Middle East policy. He is frantically looking for in these days of words, the change of conditions nothing.
The demands on Israel are clear: first The Israeli "settlements" on Palestinian territories constitutes theft of land and must be stopped, reversed or the Palestinians will be compensated.
second Israel must recognize the existence of the Palestinian state and shall not control the water rights on Palestinian territories still blocking the trade of civilian Palestinians.
third Israel will not want to rule East Jerusalem.
4th Israel should accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and work toward a nuclear-free region.
5th Israel to the peace process with Syria, Iran, strengthen Lebanon and Egypt to facilitate their own society, the military burden and pay received gifts or armor to disarm.
The demands on the Palestinian side is also clear: first The existence of Israel is recognized to end so any war, including terrorist acts, especially the Palestinians, he already brings nothing but death and misery.
second The Palestinian state should refrain from military weaponry to concentrate all forces on the development of civil society and repay received economic aid from donor countries if they do not explicitly refrain, which is only appropriate if the Palestinian policy towards Israel ensures complete serenity.
demands to the international community: Political and military guarantee for the sovereignty and integrity of both Israel and the Palestinian state. This requires broad agreements, particularly between the United States, Russia and China. The EU is to mediate between the great powers.
unconditional reciprocity are more important than This made the conflict a part of each other against the claims of decades of propaganda NOT independent, because otherwise a party to the conflict continue to speak out with the failings of the other side.
The parties are actually "victims of history", but the injustices they can not settle back without a new injustice to happen. And it would be the wrong conclusion from history that the future would always be overcome by reversals. - It needs new beginnings.
And the conflict parties have to be in terms of their role as victims realize that their driving is contentious in decades, a load factor for the entire humanity, which is also justified by anything can be. Who the world calls for solidarity must not sit by force in the wrong. - It needs a fresh start.
Netanyahu is to reach out to Hamas. Hamas is to shake hands with Netanyahu. - Who does not, also does no favors and his followers ultimately sins of the world.
discussion